9 October (1944): Neal Cassady to Justin Brierly

By noting this difference, modifying it & by a process of elimination, I find not only the amount, but also the degree, of influence you’ve had on me. For a better understanding I’ve created 3 titles under which I’ll enumerate attributes I’ve either gained or developed under you. Also if I’ve enough room I shall speak of the negative points of our relationship. To begin…

7 October (1827): Charles Lamb to H. Dodwell

Your little pig found his way to Enfield this morning without his feet, or rather his little feet came first, and as I guessed the rest of him soon followed. He is quite a beauty. It was a pity to kill him, or rather, as Rice would say, it would have been a pity not to kill him in his state of innocence.

6 October (1965): Anne Sexton to Charles Newman

I would always park at a LOADING ZONE sign and tell them “It’s okay, because we are going to get loaded” and off we’d pile into the Ritz to drink 3 or 4 or 2 martinis…often, very often, Sylvia and I would talk at length about our first suicides, at length, in detail, in depth—between the free potato chips.

Regarding Diptychs

And yet, there is no escaping the strength of the number three. A triangle is the sturdiest shape in architecture. The Buckminster Fuller geodesic dome, the pyramids, the molecular structure of diamond—all derive their stability from the strength of three. And of course, the Christian Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Ghost—a holy triptych that collapses into one idea: God. The diptych can’t escape this rule of three, and perhaps this is also part of its power. Just as the triptych is secretly a portrait, the diptych is, in a sense, a triptych…